Legal Opinion
State v. Faidley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 25, 1969No. 45,234PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
The defendant, Harold H. Faidley, was tried by a jury and convicted of the offense of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of K. S. A. 8-530. He has appealed, and asserts the following assignment of error:
“The court erred in permitting the arresting highway patrol officer to testify to his observation of the defendant’s performance of the heel-to-toe balance test which the officer ordered the defendant to perform prior to advising him of his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Sixth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. FleurySupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.