Legal Opinion

Adair v. State

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2013No. Docket No. 302142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This original taxpayer action is brought pursuant to the provisions of the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25 through 34. The action addresses the parameters of the state’s funding obligations under the second sentence of § 29 of the amendment — commonly referred to as the “prohibition of unfunded mandates” or POUM provision — and Proposal A, Const 1963, art 9, § 11. Our Supreme Court held that the state violated the POUM provision when it required plaintiff school districts to collect, maintain, and report to the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) certain…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Adair v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API