Legal Opinion

Pline v. Parsons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. Docket No. 51PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendants, assigning error, say that the evidence shows no negligence on their part, and that plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. About noon, August 2, 1924, plaintiff’s decedent, Peter N. Pline, was driving a Ford car west on a highway near Grand Rapids, known as Alpine road. Defendant Edna Parsons was driving a Hudson sedan, owned by her husband, the other defendant, south on State trunk line M-54, a paved road, 18 feet wide. As he approached the intersection, deceased’s view to the north was obstructed by bushes along the roadside (except a space…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Salmon v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. Ward v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Harris v. P. Koenig Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Finkler v. ZimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McCulley v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bugbee v. FowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API