Legal Opinion

Cox v. Turner Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1988No. 00059PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) appeals from the judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, Robert and Gloria Cox. Turner seeks reversal on the basis of alleged trial errors, chief among them the trial court’s refusal to hold that Turner was plaintiff-Robert Cox’s statutory employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Finding no merit to Turner’s contentions, we affirm.

United States Steel Corporation planned to construct a skyscraper on a site which it owned on Grant Street in Pittsburgh. It designated USS Realty Development (“USR”), a division of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Indus. Park No. 2Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Capozzoli v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Peck v. Delaware County Board of Prison InspectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Emery v. Leavesly McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Travaglia v. C.H. Schwertner & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Mathis v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API