Brooklyn Central & Jamaica Rail Road v. Brooklyn City Rail Road
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order made at a special term, denying a motion for a preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Brown, J.
The justice who heard the motion for an injunction in this action, at the special term, determined that crossing the railway of the plaintiff by the rails and horse cars of the defendant, was not an appropriation of the property- of the former to the use of the latter, but a mode of exercising the public right of passage and travel over the highway known as Atlantic street when such rail was laid down. From this judgment we cannot dissent, for we ought not, upon a motion for a preliminary injunction, to affirm what has not yet been authoritatively affirmed in any…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Craig v. . Rochester City Brighton R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Central Passenger Railway Co. v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Elizabethtown, Railroad v. Ashland, Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Brooklyn City & Newtown Rail Road v. Coney Island & Brooklyn Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.