Legal Opinion

Deist v. Beck

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1929No. Docket Nos. 5321, 5912Published

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

These two cases were ordered consolidated on appeal. Respondent has failed to aid the court by filing any brief and, on motion of appellant, the time for filing of such brief having long since expired, the appeals were ordered submitted on appellant’s briefs.

Each case is an action seeking recovery of payments alleged to be due on the same contract for the purchase of real property, the first seeking recovery of payments claimed to be due up to February 12, 1924, and the second seeking recovery for payments alleged to be in default for the period between March 12, 1924,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Scott v. Hollywood Park Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Eddy v. StoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API