Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Siegle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 36,414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Tobacco river and Littlefield creek flow over a large part of the north half of the southeast quarter of section 26, in township 17 north, of range 5 west, near Farwell, Clare county, Michigan. The lands, together with those adjoining, belonged to Edmund Hall in the year 1870, when he built a dam with a head of 9 feet of water across the Tobacco river for logging purposes. The water flowing over the lands forms a mill pond. Three or four years after Hall built the dam, George L. Hitchcock built the present dam for a grist mill some 40 or 50 feet from the site of the original Hall dam which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Goodrich v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Burt v. MungerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bauerle v. Charlevoix County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API