Legal Opinion

Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 13, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The allegations in the declaration in substance are that the plaintiffs are the owners of a parcel of land upon which there is a pond, “ the flowage rights in which are claimed and alleged to be owned ” by the defendant; “ that the said defendant maintains and uses exclusively in connection with and for the operation of its mill for the manufacture of textile fabrics a certain dam to maintain said flowage for the said operation of said mill; ” that the cutting and harvesting of ice by them (the plaintiffs) “on or about January 13, 1919, and at any and all times during the season of ice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker Ice Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Handforth v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Richards v. GauffretMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Ottawa Gas-light & Coke Co. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Labbadia v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. Davenport v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. SiegleMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Roach v. SturdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API