Legal Opinion

Armsby Co. v. Shewmake & Murphy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 23, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. October 4, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. When under a contract of sale the articles which are the subject-matter of the sale are to be of a given quality, the actual receipt by the purchaser of the articles will not preclude him from refusing to accept them on the ground that they are not of the quality stipulated for in the contract, when an. inspection and examination of such articles, as well as a refusal to accept the same, accompanied by a tender of the articles, is made within a reasonable time after they are received. See Benj. Sales (Bennett’s 7th Am. ed.), §§ 139, 701, 703; Clark, Con. p. 142; Diversy v. Kellogg, 44 Ill.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diversy v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Ventress v. RosserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Little v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SherrerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. RAYMOND ROWE FURNITURE COMPANY v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Flag Fish Company Inc. v. Mann Seafood Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. York Ice Machinery Corp. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Snellgrove v. DingelhoefCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API