Legal Opinion

Little v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Complaint on note. Before Judge Gober. Milton superior court. February term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

1. Promissory notes found among the papers of an illiterate deceased person, purporting to have been signed by him with his mark and which he had paid, are, on the trial of an action against his administrator upon another promissory note also purporting to have been signed by the intestate with his mark, admissible in evidence for the purpose of comparing the marks on these notes with that affixed to the note in suit, the defense to the action being that this latter note was a forgery. The genuineness of the marks upon the notes offered for this purpose might be inferred from the facts above…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dalton v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Jones v. GranthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Williams v. GunnelsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  4. Continental National Bank v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Rabun v. RabunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Alexander SuttonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Ausmus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Livingston v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Johnson v. SherrerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. State v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API