York Ice Machinery Corp. v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds. An amendment to the motion contains additional grounds. Several of them assign error upon portions of the court’s instructions to the jury; and one assigns error on the court’s failure to charge the jury on the question of the extent of the liability of the defendant in the event it was found from the evidence that there were any defects or deficient parts in the machinery which caused or tended to cause the plant to produce less than the quantity of ice specified in the guaranties, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Diversy v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Case Threshing Machine Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Aripeka Saw Mills v. Georgia Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Pound v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961