Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Unknown
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided December 13, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00903Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DALLAS RAY BLANKENSHIP, III, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-903-JD-JEM SHERIFF OF ELKHART COUNTY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Dallas Ray Blankenship, III, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint from the Elkhart County Correctional Center, about the period that she was denied access to the hormone therapy medications she needs as a transgender female to treat her gender dysphoria. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.