Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Facetglas, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 21, 1984No. 0177PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a tort action in which appellant Gerald L. Troutman seeks to recover damages from Facetglas, Inc. for wrongful discharge. After Troutman presented his evidence, the trial court granted Facetglas’s motion for an involuntary nonsuit on the ground that Troutman’s complaint “failed to state a cause of action cognizable in this state.” We affirm.

Troutman’s complaint alleges and the evidence shows that he was a stockholder in Facetglas. He was also an officer, a member of the board of directors and plant manager at Facetglas’s Rock Hill plant pursuant to an employment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. National American Corp. v. Federal Republic of NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. Shipes v. Piggly Wiggly St. Andrews, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. City of Columbia, South Carolina, Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. The City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  4. Lawless v. Central Production Credit Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Crocker v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API