Drovers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. Roller
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.), overruling exceptions to an Auditor’s report and finally ratifying the same.
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
There are two questions to be disposed of on this appeal and they both arise upon exceptions to an Auditor’s report. One involves quite an interesting question of law, the other chiefly a question of fact. The circumstances out of which the first question grows are these : The firm or copartnership of Sheeler and Ripple had for a number of years been engaged in the live stock commission business in Baltimore. Qn the seventeenth day of January, 1895, D. & W. Roller, of Tennessee, consigned to Sheeler and Ripple for sale a quantity of live hogs which when received by the consignees on January…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Nonotuck Silk Co. v. FlandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- County Commissioners v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Bank Commissioners v. Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- In re MulliganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- Brown v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Rottger, Rec. v. First-Merchants Natl. BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.