Legal Opinion
Kalosky v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1983No. (2055)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTesto, J.
The plaintiff, a retired member of the Waterbury fire department, brought this action claiming that he was entitled to a disability pension equal to 76 percent of his annual pay. During the trial, corporation counsel for the city of Waterbury was allowed to testify on the history of art. XXXIII, § 12 of the collective bargaining agreement between the city and Local 1339 International Association of Firefighters, AFL—CIO. The trial court admitted the evidence. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.
The facts can be summarized as follows: The plaintiff had been a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. MauroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Eastern Sportswear Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stelco Industries, Inc. v. BetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Thomas E. Golden Realty Co. v. Echo SixConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Orange Improvements Partnership v. Cardo, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 2004