Legal Opinion
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Mauro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff, Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, brought this action to determine its rights in and to bowling equipment located in a building formerly owned by the defendant Nicholas Mauro, who had mortgaged it to the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest in 1964. The plaintiff claims that it acquired title to this bowling equipment by virtue of the strict foreclosure of the mortgage in 1968. Mauro claims that this equipment had been excluded from the mortgage, that it was personalty and that title remained in him after foreclosure. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered in favor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 35 v. Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Capen v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- In Re SpanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.