Legal Opinion
Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Eastern Sportswear Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 22, 1970No. File No. CV-14-679-31337PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.
This action was brought to recover the balance due on an instalment contract for one hot-drink machine. From the judgment for the defendant the plaintiff has appealed, assigning error in the court’s finding and conclusions and in the admission of certain evidence. The assignments pursued in the brief involve claims under the parol evidence rule, and these we consider. Other assignments not briefed we consider abandoned. Shelton Yacht S Cabana Club, Inc. v. Suto, 150 Conn. 251, 256.
The material portions of the finding may be summarized as follows: In 1965, and for some time prior thereto,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Taft Realty Corp. v. Yorkhaven Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Shelton Yacht & Cabana Club, Inc. v. SutoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Gray v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Warnaco, Inc. v. FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Crescent Oil and Shipping Services, Ltd. v. Phibro Energy, Inc., and Salomon Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Kalosky v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Warnaco, Inc. v. FarkasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Crescent Oil and Shipping Services, Ltd. v. Phibro Energy, Inc., and Salomon Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.