Legal Opinion

Groom v. Bangs

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1908No. S.F. No. 4563PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment after an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint demurred to purports to state a cause of action in favor of Marshall W. Groom to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him from the death of Hattie L. Groom, his wife. It alleges that she was, at all the times mentioned, his wife, that the defendant, a licensed physician, was employed by plaintiff to treat her, that she was thereupon placed under his care and that he was negligent, careless, ignorant, and unskillful, that in consequence of his ignorant, unskillful, negligent, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Knott v. McGilvrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farr v. BramblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Perkins v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brown v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Reed v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API