Orr-Hickey v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
Lisa Orr-Hickey was convicted of hunting sheep in a closed area and possessing illegally-taken game (the sheep). 1 She asserts that her jury received flawed instructions concerning the culpable mental state required for these crimes.
In State v. Rice, 2 , the Alaska Supreme Court held that civil negligence is the culpable mental state that governs hunting offenses. That is, the government must prove that the hunter either “kn[e]w or reasonably should [have] know[n]” the circumstances that made the hunter’s conduct illegal. 3 Orr-Hickey’s jury was instructed in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Lagos v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lamkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010