Legal Opinion

Orr-Hickey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 5, 1999No. A-6572PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

Lisa Orr-Hickey was convicted of hunting sheep in a closed area and possessing illegally-taken game (the sheep). 1 She asserts that her jury received flawed instructions concerning the culpable mental state required for these crimes.

In State v. Rice, 2 , the Alaska Supreme Court held that civil negligence is the culpable mental state that governs hunting offenses. That is, the government must prove that the hunter either “kn[e]w or reasonably should [have] know[n]” the circumstances that made the hunter’s conduct illegal. 3 Orr-Hickey’s jury was instructed in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lagos v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API