Legal Opinion
Milstein v. Huck
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1984No. CV 83-1287PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
In this action, maintained as a class action for the purposes of settlement, plaintiffs’ counsel, Milberg Weiss Bershod Speethrie & Lerach (Milberg Weiss), has obtained a settlement for the class. The settlement establishes a settlement fund of $908,377.60 and, in addition, the defendants agreed to bear the costs associated with the providing of notice and the administration of the settlement. In approving the settlement, this Court has found that it is “fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the members of the Class.” See Findings…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Weseley v. Spear, Leeds & KelloggDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Schwartz v. Novo Industri A/SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- American Carriers, Inc. v. Baytree Investors, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- In re Luxottica Group S.P.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006