Legal Opinion

Ziesmer v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2003No. B162045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we conclude that the dismissal of a grand jury indictment pursuant to Penal Code section 995, subdivision (a)(1)(A) terminates the action. Therefore, if the action is refiled and assigned to the same judge to whom the case was originally assigned, a party may disqualify the judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6.

We grant David Ziesmer’s petition for writ of mandate and direct respondent court to vacate its order denying Ziesmer’s timely peremptory challenge to the judge assigned to his case.

Facts

On August 21, 2000, the Ventura County Grand Jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ziesmer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API