Legal Opinion

Ex parte Holman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 1869PublishedCited by 29 opinions

National and State courts : conflict of authority, ETC. : APPLICATION FOE A WETT OF HABEAS 'CORPUS.-The petitioners for tbis writ are the supervisors of the county of Lee, in the State of Iowa. The defendant in the petition for the writ is the deputy United States marshal for the district of Iowa. The defendant appeals from an order discharging the plaintiffs from his custody.

Read the full summary

National and State courts : conflict of authority, ETC. : APPLICATION FOE A WETT OF HABEAS 'CORPUS.-The petitioners for tbis writ are the supervisors of the county of Lee, in the State of Iowa. The defendant in the petition for the writ is the deputy United States marshal for the district of Iowa. The defendant appeals from an order discharging the plaintiffs from his custody. The facts out of which the legal questions arise are undisputed, and are as follows: Thompson obtained judgment upon coupons attached to bonds issued by the county of Lee in payment of stock in certain railroad…

1Opinion of the Court

Dillon, Ch. J.

l. Jurisdiction: ra?couus:feae" habeas corpus. Treating the questions arising on this appeal in a manner befitting their gravity and imPutañee, it is proposed to refrain from the discussion of all topics which do not necessaiq]y ;qe jn phe pathway of the judicial determination of the precise case presented by the record. That the writ of habeas corpus is of. transcendant value; that it is the keystone of American as of English liberty; that the people of this State enjoy and have always enjoyed, without denial or abridgment, the right to this writ; and that it is an efficacious…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  3. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Clark v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Morrissey v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Ware v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API