Washington ex rel. City of Seattle v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing on Motion to Remand.
A petition for rehearing has been filed and additional authorities cited.1 No fault can be found with these cases, but they have no application to the facts stated in the record. The affidavit of the plaintiff states the franchise of the defendant has been transferred to Crosby without the franchise property. If true, the defendant is occupying the streets of plaintiff city at sufferance. The defendant has acquired from time to time “other telephone lines, facilities, and equipment which have been so commingled, consolidated a/nd confused with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ayres v. WiswallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The People v. . the Albany and Vermont Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Thompson v. Allen CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.