Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Manfuso
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-2741PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment by plaintiff and defendant Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (“Alcon”), their respective oppositions thereto, the parties’ replies, and the entire record herein. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants defendant Alcon’s motion for partial summary judgment and denies plaintiff’s cross-motion.
On September 16, 1983, plaintiff Friedman brought this action for compensatory and punitive damages against defendant Alcon. Plaintiff thereafter amended the complaint to add…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Robert James Richards v. Milton Stanley Mileski (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. ExpressTrak, L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Reese v. Loew's Madison Hotel CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Vulcan Arbor Hill Corp. v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Vulcan Arbor Hill Corporation v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996