Legal Opinion
In Re Myers
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 5, 2003No. 25647PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct recommended that Respondent receive a public reprimand for violating Rule 5.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), Rule 407, SCACR, finding that he had failed to ensure that his Deputy Solicitor adhered to these Rules (hereinafter the Quattlebaum Matter). Further, the Panel recommended that Respondent receive a letter of caution for permitting a member of his “jury selection team” to attempt to contact a member of the jury venire (hereinafter the Juror Matter).
I. THE QUATTLEBAUM MATTER
On Memorial Day,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- In the Matter of DelgadoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- In re DiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- In re SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WARDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- In Re CurrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- In Re HumphriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- In the Matter of FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WARD and STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. STARRSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015