Legal Opinion

Mary Laws Steelman, of the Estate of Charlie Steelman v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1963No. 24-60PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff, as executrix of the estate of Charlie Steelman, sues to recover retired pay alleged to have been due decedent as a retired enlisted man of the Regular Navy1 for the period beginning *734February 27, 1951. His Navy retired pay was discontinued on that date because he then began receiving disability ■compensation under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 757.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment.2 Defendant has opposed plaintiff’s motion and moves the court for an order granting judgment on the pleadings for defendant, dismissing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Tanner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Mulholland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Tawes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. ArrienDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1965
  3. Amarillo Air Force Base Exchange v. LeaveyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1964
  4. Court v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Mary Laws Steelman, of the Estate of Charlie Steelman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API