Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Podolsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 15, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant challenges the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found him ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed and charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits in the amount of $10,800. During the unemployment benefit period, claimant, the president and shareholder in a computer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of De MariaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of FittonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of BezdezowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of BaglieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API