Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 21, 1994No. 24038PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

We granted Vanessa D. Smith’s (Smith) petition for writ of certiorari to review Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , — S.C. —, 427 S.E. (2d) 712 (Ct. App. 1993). Smith contends that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming a directed verdict for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) on the ground that there was no evidence of the cause of Smith’s fall. We agree and reverse.

I. Facts

Smith instituted this action seeking recovery for damages she incurred as a result of falling in Wal-Mart. At trial, Smith testified that she fell while walking past some shopping carts “scattered” in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wimberley v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Moore v. LevitreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Howard v. K-Mart Discount StoresCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Singletary v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Hoover v. BroomeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Genovese v. BergeronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Payton v. KearseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Sullivan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API