Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Broome

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1996No. 2583PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge:

In this premises liability action, Ernie Hoover sued Edna Broome, doing business as Broome’s Service Center, alleging he was injured as a result of Broome’s negligence, wantonness, willfiilness, and recklessness in failing to warn or give notice of the imminent danger presented by an unguarded grease pit. The trial court refused to charge the jury the law of the invitee, finding as a matter of law that Hoover was a licensee. The trial court also denied Hoover’s motion for a directed verdict regarding Broome’s liability for Hoover’s accident. Finding no negligence, the jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shipes v. Piggly Wiggly St. Andrews, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Callander Ex Rel. Lingos v. Charleston Doughnut Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Neil v. ByrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Garrett v. LockeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Dalon v. Golden Lanes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sims v. GilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Goode v. St. Stephens United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Nesbitt v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Vogt v. Murraywood Swim and Racquet ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API