Legal Opinion

State v. Lusby

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 1, 2001No. 18869-8-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eitzen, J.*

—After entering a negotiated plea, Pat Lusby appeals her conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. First, she contends the trial court abused its discretion when it denied her motion to compel the State to reveal the identity of a confidential informant. Next, she contends the sentencing enhancement set forth in RCW 9.94A.310(6) cannot serve to more than double her standard range sentence. Third, Ms. Lusby contends the sentencing enhancement violates federal and state equal protection laws. Finally, she contends the sentencing court failed to recognize it had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HeptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State Of Washington, V John Allen Booth, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API