Legal Opinion

State v. Snapp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 2009No. 37210-0-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

219 P.3d 971 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Gerald SNAPP, Appellant.

No. 37210-0-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

November 9, 2009.

Sheri Lynn Arnold, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Stephen D. Trinen, Pierce County Prosecutors Ofc., Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

PUBLISHED IN PART OPINION

BRIDGEWATER, P.J.

¶ 1 Daniel Gerald Snapp entered a Newton[1] plea to six counts of second degree identity theft on November 16, 2007. Within the plea agreement, the prosecutor's handwritten recommendation includes language stating that Snapp could appeal the trial court's…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. LouthanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. SlighteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. SlighteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API