State v. Snapp
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*488¶1 Daniel Gerald Snapp entered a Newton1 plea to six counts of second degree identity theft on November 16, 2007. Within the plea agreement, the prosecutor’s handwritten recommendation includes language stating that Snapp could appeal the trial court’s decision regarding his CrR 3.6 suppression motion. Even though Snapp does not appeal the voluntariness of his plea, we hold that the State waived any objection to Snapp’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress by including that language in his statement on plea of guilty. We also hold that under Arizona v. Gant,_U.S._, 129…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LouthanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. SlighteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. SlighteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.