Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Appleby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSummers, Justice
Although I concur in portions of the opinion I must respectfully dissent from the Court’s conclusion that ANR’s lien is ineffective as to any material or services provided more than three years before the lien was perfected by filing. Our recent case of Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation v. Vick, 840 P.2d 619 (Okla.1992) and the earlier decisions on which it relies should dictate a different result.
The majority reasons that the oral agreement between the operator of the oil well and Appleby is the obligation upon which the lien is based. Under 12 O.S.1991 § 95, this obligation — an oral contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Conroy v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Davis v. BullardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Industrial Tile Co. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.