Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Perry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Labette District Court. Action by Conroy against Perry, to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. The facts appear in the opinion in Perry v. Conroy, 22 Kas. 717, et seq., and in the opinion, infra. At the November Term, 1880, the court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended and supplemental petition, and rendered judgment for costs against Conroy, who brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This case has been to this court once before, and is reported in 22 Kas. 716. At that time a judgment enforcing a mechanics’ lien was reversed, and the case was remanded with instructions to render judgment for costs in favor of the defendant. Thereafter, as appears from the record now before us, leave was given to file a supplemental petition. The same was filed, and then a demurrer thereto was sustained, and from that ruling plaintiff brings error. *473The difficulty we have in determining this case is more from what the record omits than from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. WheatSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Perry v. ConroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Shellabarger v. BishopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Jenkins v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eastern Ohio Oil Co. v. McEvoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Duffitt & Ramsey v. CrozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Salvation Army v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Snellings Lumber Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. F. M. Spalding Lumber Co. v. SlusherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API