Legal Opinion
State v. Cruz
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 2007No. 31880PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge Pro Tem.
The state appeals from the district court’s order suppressing evidence the state sought to admit in the prosecution of Ernesto Cruz. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Cruz was paroled after being convicted of possession of a controlled substance. Cruz agreed to abide by several parole conditions, including that he would “submit to a search of person or property, to include residence and vehicle, at any time and place by any agent of Field and Community Services and [he] does waive constitutional right to be free from such…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Dustin Thomas ArmstrongIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. AdamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. HedgecockIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. JuliusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Bryan Beam v. Parole Officer L. Dater-Twomey, Meridian Police Officer Grace Lloyd, Meridian Police Officer Andrew Herscowitz, Meridian Police Officer Daniel James, Meridian Police Department, et al.District Court, D. Idaho · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.