Legal Opinion

Hamama v. Adducci

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 2, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–11910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENYING IN PART RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 135), GRANTING IN PART PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 138), AND GRANTING IN PART PETITIONERS' AMENDED MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS (Dkt. 139)

Last July, this Court put a halt to the deportation of hundreds of aliens whom the Executive Branch of the Federal Government had sought to repatriate to their native Iraq. The Court ruled that they must be given a hearing before immigration judges on their claims that they would face persecution, torture, and possibly death if sent back. While that immigration court process proceeds…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamama v. AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Sow v. BarrDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API