Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Foster

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1885No. 11,529PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee brought this -action to recover the value of a trunk and its contents. Her counsel concede that the evidence in the case is correctly set out in appellant’s brief. As there set out it is as follows, except some immaterial omissions :■

Mary Foster, the plaintiff, testified :

“ On the 17th day of November, 1882,1 was going to Chicago on a visit, and on the evening before tried to find a man to take my trunk to the depot. I met Mel Quimby, and he said he would send a man. Will Spicer came to take my trunk. I told him to take it to the depot and tell the baggageman that I was going off on…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bodine v. . Exchange Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bates Motor Transport Lines, Inc. v. Mayer, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API