Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Brief Case Co. v. Specialty Leather Products Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 26, 1956No. Civ. A. 325-55PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
This patent case for infringement brought by the Philadelphia Brief Case Company, a partnership, as plaintiff, hereinafter called “Philadelphia”, against the Specialty Leather Products Co., Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, hereinafter called “Newark”, involves two somewhat unusual situations. In the first place, Philadelphia has attempted to join as an unwilling plaintiff, under the rules, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 19(a), 28 U.S.C., the patentee, its licensor, National Leather Handle Company, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter called “Chicago”, together…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- AsymmetRx, Inc. v. Biocare Medical, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Manning v. Miller Music CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.