Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Ryan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,527PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendants to recover damages for an alleged libel. Defendants interposed a motion to strike the complaint on the ground tíiat it did not state a cause of action. The motion was sustained, the complaint stricken, judgment entered against plaintiff for costs, and he appeals.

It is alleged in the complaint that an aldermanic election was to be held February 26,1935, in the City of Chicago; that under the law, one desiring to become a candidate was required to file his petition with the election commissioners of the City of Chicago; that the petition should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shinglemeyer v. Wright.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Strauss v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Independent Life Insurance v. RodgersTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jones v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parker v. KirklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Thomas v. PetrulisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Brewer v. Hearst Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Mauvis-Jarvis v. WongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API