Fedderwitz v. Lamb
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
If the petition states the truth, the defendants are liable, unless the alleged publication was absolutely privileged. In an action for libel, that a writing constituted a conditional privilege is generally a matter for plea. Holmes v. Clisby, 118 Ga. 820 (45 S. E. 684); Flanders v. Daley, 120 Ga. 885 (48 S. E. 327). But if it appears upon the face of the petition that the communication was really privileged, this may be taken advantage of by demurrer. Atlanta News Publishing Co. v. Medlock, 123 Ga. 714, 721 (51 S. E. 756, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1139). “The characteristic feature…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Atlanta News Publishing Co. v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Aransas Harbor Terminal Ry. Co. v. TaberTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Wilson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Morton v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Renton v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Fleming v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.