Legal Opinion

Bank of America v. Estate of Hood

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellants, Gregory Simakas and Michael Newman (“Appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s January 26, 2011 order setting aside a sheriffs sale of real estate. We reverse.

The record reflects the following factual and procedural background. On February 13, 2009, Bank of America (the “Bank”) filed a complaint in foreclosure against a house and 100 acres of property (the “Property”) owned by the Estate of Robert L. Hood (the “Estate”), as the Estate was in default under the terms of its mort*1210gage loan from the Bank. The original sheriffs sale date was July 16, 2010, but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SwiftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. CAPOZZI v. AntonoplosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Blue Ball National Bank v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Bornman v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Fidelity Bank v. PiersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. LarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Bank of America, NA v. ESTATE OF HOODSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Cadles of Grassy Meadows v. Shavei-Tzion, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Fairway Cons. Disct. Co. v. Laskowski, C. & K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. In re: Upset Sale TCB Tioga Co; Apl of: OstapowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API