Bank of America v. Estate of Hood
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DONOHUE, J.:
Appellants, Gregory Simakas and Michael Newman (“Appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s January 26, 2011 order setting aside a sheriffs sale of real estate. We reverse.
The record reflects the following factual and procedural background. On February 13, 2009, Bank of America (the “Bank”) filed a complaint in foreclosure against a house and 100 acres of property (the “Property”) owned by the Estate of Robert L. Hood (the “Estate”), as the Estate was in default under the terms of its mort*1210gage loan from the Bank. The original sheriffs sale date was July 16, 2010, but…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SwiftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- CAPOZZI v. AntonoplosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Blue Ball National Bank v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bornman v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fidelity Bank v. PiersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. LarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bank of America, NA v. ESTATE OF HOODSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cadles of Grassy Meadows v. Shavei-Tzion, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Fairway Cons. Disct. Co. v. Laskowski, C. & K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re: Upset Sale TCB Tioga Co; Apl of: OstapowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.