Legal Opinion

CAPOZZI v. Antonoplos

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1964No. Appeal, 87PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Tom G. Zaimes, Anthony P. Antonoplos and Milton P. Antonoplos were the sole owners in equal proportions of the stock of the Monroeville Drive-In Corporation. A dispute arose concerning salaries paid share holders employed by the corporation. The Antonoploses retained Attorneys Alvin D. Capozzi and David Marlin Laufe to represent their individual interests. A settlement was reached and agreement consummated by the parties involved on August 27, 1960, which provided, inter alia, that the corporate stock certificates were to be endorsed with the legend making the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Witney v. Lebanon CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Brenner v. SukenikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Seligsohn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. BlickleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wenzel v. Morris Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Looper v. Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Blue Ball National Bank v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Scampone, R. v. Grane Healthcare Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Bornman v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API