Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith (No. 1)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1934No. 1; Appeal 53PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On September 15, 1932, an indictment was returned against appellant charging a violation of Section 1 of the Act of June 12,1878, P. L. 196,18 PS §2511, which, insofar as applicable to this case, provides: “If any person being an......agent......of any...... quasi municipal corporation shall fraudulently take, convert or apply to his own use......any of the money ......of such......quasi municipal corporation...... he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

In the charging part of the indictment it was averred that on March 30, 1932, appellant “being then and there an agent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Teslovich Et Ux. v. Fire. F. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. CamwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Warner v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Monaghan v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API