Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1917No. 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Smith County ; J. R. Warren, Judge. Suit by Joe Meyer against Horace Arnold and others. Prom the order appointing a receiver, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

This appeal is from an order made in vacation appointing a receiver. The suit was instituted by the appellee against the appellants, R. S. Arnold and Willie Clay to recover a judgment on certain promissory notes and to foreclose liens given to secure their payment. The first note described.in the petition is one on which a balance of $354.45, exclusive of interest and attorney’s fees, was claimed to be due. This note, it is alleged, was secured by a mortgage upon certain horses, cattle, farm implements, and crops to be grown during the years of 1916, 1917, and 1,918. The plaintiff also sought…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Butts v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Solomon v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Alto Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Myerscough v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Head v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Morris v. North Fort Worth State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API