Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Mathews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1922No. 1914PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hutchinson County; W. R. Ewing, Judge. Suit by L. W. Mathews and others against Mattie Solomon and others. An interlocutory order was made appointing a receiver without notice to defendants, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order, made without notice to the defendants, appointing a receiver_of certain property.

The plaintiffs, U. W. Mathews and J. A. Ballentine, brought the suit against Mattie Soloinon, Will Solomon, John Jasper, and Boss Jasper, alleging—

that the plaintiffs, on January 4, 1921, purchased, at foreclosure sale duly made, certain land in Hutchinson county, Tex., which had theretofoi’e been owned by Mattie Solomon and Will Solomon, thereby acquiring the title of the said Solomons; that at the time of the sale John Jasper and Boss Jasper were cultivating a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Webb v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Haywood v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Security Land Co. v. South Texas Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Krumnow v. Krumnow, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. North Side Bank v. WachendorferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Baptist Missionary & Educational Convention v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Amason v. HarriganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Myerscough v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API