Legal Opinion

Dean v. Cole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From-Marion: Percy E. Kelly, Judge. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtBubnett, C. J.

1. Prior to the controversy between the parties, embodied in this litigation, Dean owned a city lot in Portland and Cole owned acreage in Marion County. They exchanged these pieces of realty by Dean’s conveying the lot, rating the value at $8,000, which was credited on the purchase price of the acreage, fixed at $11,500. Instead of Cole’s conveying the acreage to Dean, they entered into a contract whereby Cole agreed to convey and Dean covenanted to buy the acreage, the deed to be made upon the payment by Dean of the balance of the purchase price, $3,500, to be applied in liquidation of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boelk v. NolanOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Johnson v. Dave's Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sheppard v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Virgil N. Lee, Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Margaret L. PagettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API