Boelk v. Nolan
Oregon Supreme Court
From Tillamook: George H. Burnett, Judge. This is a suit by Herman Boelk against Oak Nolan to set aside a deed to 160 acres of land which the plaintiff executed and delivered to the defendant (appellant), on the 7th day of October, 1907. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater
1. Defendant has appealed from a decree canceling for fraud a deed executed by plaintiff at Vina, California, on October 8, 1907, purporting to convey to defendant 160 acres of land in Tillamook County, for the consideration of $25, and requiring defendant to reconvey the land to plaintiff. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint on the grounds that (1) it contains several causes of suit not separately stated; and (2) it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit. The first of .these challenges to the complaint is not that several causes of action have been improperly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Rorer Iron Co. v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Bade v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Caples v. SteelOregon Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by19 opinions
- Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Sorenson v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.