Legal Opinion

Martinez v. O'Hara

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 28, 2019No. G054840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FYBEL, ACTING P. J.

*854INTRODUCTION

In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the plaintiff's attorney committed misconduct on appeal, including manifesting gender bias, and we report him to the State Bar. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we affirm the trial court's denial of a motion for attorney fees.

Following the termination of his employment, Fernando Martinez (plaintiff) sued Stephen Stratton O'Hara (O'Hara), Career Solution and Candidate *855Acquisitions (CSCA), O'Hara Family Trust, OCRE, Inc., Professional Realty Council, Inc., and Pacific Valley Realty, Inc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ramirez v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re KovenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Briganti v. ChowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API