Legal Opinion
In Re Koven
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 2005No. B184017, B184018PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
These contempt proceedings arise from two petitions for rehearing filed by attorney Debra L. Koven (Koven) on behalf of her client, Paul Bashkin (Bashkin). In no uncertain terms Koven accuses us of “deliberate judicial dishonesty.” (In re Buckley (1973) 10 Cal.3d 237, 250 [110 Cal.Rptr. 121, 514 P.2d 1201].) These accusations are not only false: they are “insolent, offensive, insulting, and [impugn] the integrity of [this] court.” (Ibid.) After we issued the orders to show cause and apparently after some reflection, Koven now concedes that the accusations “are both improper…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Adams v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re CiraoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hume v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martinez v. O'Hara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Crawford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- A Company Hungary KFT v. BespalovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Crawford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.