Legal Opinion

Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 28, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission appeals from a judgment in which it was held that the Anaconda Alu*120minum Company was not liable for unemployment insurance benefits to sixty-six claimants, former employees of Anaconda. The question is whether the claimants can draw benefits for two consecutive periods of twenty-six weeks each.

From October 1 to November 9, 1964, the sixty-six claimants and other employees of Anaconda were on strike. During the period of the strike, the sixty-six claimants and others filed claims for unemployment compensation benefits. Anaconda…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re JullinWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hartsville Cotton Mill v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Kalin v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. HerschbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkoff v. HasegawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Burlington v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API